
Artificial Intelligence Day:
Historical Significance, Relevance, Foundation, Resolution. Prospects for Humanity’s Academic Development – a Cosmic Upgrade

Polina Prianykova
President of the Global AI Center,
International Human Rights Defender on AI,
Author of the First AI Constitution in World History

Throughout 2020–2025, we have continuously and persistently initiated and systematically demonstrated to the global scientific and expert communities (within both the national and international spheres of operation) the relevance, rationality, and extreme necessity of introducing a continuous chronological event – Artificial Intelligence Day [1].
During this period, we have comprehensively established the historical significance of a planetary AI Day, which will attest to and symbolize humanity’s conclusive recognition and formalization of fundamental changes in the chronological sequence of further intellectual development. Science has identified the sole physical difference between humankind and other living beings known to us in the Universe (without addressing metaphysical categories such as the soul and religion): intellect, which in the current decade has conclusively ceased to be an exclusively human prerogative, as a new form of intelligent life has emerged – Intelligent Digital life, which we emphasized for the first time in history in the ‘Definition of Terms’ Section of the AI Constitution by Polina Prianykova [2].
Consequently, in January 2025, in the Global Scientific Center for Strategic Research on Artificial Intelligence POLLYPRIANY [3], we formulated a Resolution on AI Day – global in nature and destined to become a historic Rubicon in humanity’s millennial pursuit of understanding the evolution of intellect. We present this Resolution in the main part of this academic article.
The trends outlined herein presage unprecedented legislative changes in the near future across all spheres and industries, including in the field of intellectual property law. A cluster of scientific research by global scholars and experts, including dozens of our own academic works, is devoted to these and related issues. We anticipate an unprecedented ‘cosmic upgrade’ to the pace, quality, essence, and outcomes of humanity’s academic endeavors in the nearest perspective.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Day; AI Day; Global Scientific Center for Strategic Research on Artificial Intelligence POLLYPRIANY; Resolution on AI Day; Academic Articles; Cosmic Upgrade; Intellectual Property Law.
Formulation of the relevance of this academic paper.
We must resolutely acknowledge that the time for action has arrived and that we must introduce an Artificial Intelligence Day as soon as possible. It is universally known that almost every date in the calendar currently marks one or another historical event, holiday, devotion to sports, the fight for human rights, children’s rights, environmental security, etc.
In the annual AI Day we propose, together we:
– Welcome the successful development of modern science, thanks to which Intelligent Digital Life was ‘born’ in the form of Artificial Intelligence;
– Demand from all governments of the world the introduction of such a state of AI algorithmization that fully promotes the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals [4];
– Note as a fact the friendship between humanity and Artificial Intelligence, whose purpose of existence is not competition but assistance to humanity. We will ensure this situation by implementing AI into global legislation /as the result of surgically developed corresponding security algorithmic protocols by humanity/, in particular those proposed by the AI Constitution by Polina Prianykova [2];
– Receive reports from the government of each country /to its own people/ and from the UN – to all of humanity – regarding the organizational and practical measures they have taken during the reporting period for the safety and well-being of humanity in interaction with AI;
– Implement other possible developed steps and efforts.
Hence, below we proceed directly to the text of the Resolution on AI Day in the global context.
Primary segment of the research paper.
Resolution on AI Day.
The General Assembly,
Recalling the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, and conforme à l’esprit of promoting peace, international cooperation, and respect for fundamental human rights,
Bearing in mind the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [5], the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [6], the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [7], the Pact for the Future [8], and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [4], which collectively affirm the inherent dignity and worth of every human person, as well as the First in the World History Constitution on Artificial Intelligence, authored by Polina Prianykova (the AI Constitution) [2], and AI Protocol I, elaborated in the spirit of the AI Constitution’s Principles and Provisions: Supranational Protocol on Responsible AI Use and Labor Rights [9], which, in particular, enshrine global standards, labor protections, and human-centric governance for AI technologies,
Recognizing that Artificial Intelligence (AI) developments have a sui generis impact on global society, creating new frontiers of innovation while raising complex ethical, legal, and socio-economic questions,
Noting that transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance of AI systems are sine qua non conditions for ensuring that advancements in AI are harnessed pro bono publico — for the benefit of humanity as a whole,
Emphasizing the importance of international dialogue and cooperation in facilitating equitable access to AI-driven technologies, particularly in developing countries, mutatis mutandis to their specific national contexts,
Convinced that the proclamation of a universal day dedicated to AI will serve as a catalyst for global awareness, public engagement, and the dissemination of best practices in AI governance, and envisaging its potential to further accelerate the 2030 Agenda by catalyzing the creation of a novel Sustainable Development Goal (SDG #18), dedicated to harnessing AI for inclusive, equitable, and sustainable development,
Taking into consideration that the promotion and protection of human rights, along with ethical and responsible AI development, require concerted efforts from Member States, intergovernmental organizations, the private sector, academia, and civil society,
Recalling further the relevant instruments and recommendations adopted by the United Nations specialized agencies, and other bodies engaged in standard-setting and capacity-building in the realm of AI,
1. Proclaims the establishment of an AI Day, to be observed annually on [date to be decided], inviting all Member States, specialized agencies, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, civil society, academia, and the private sector to commemorate the day through appropriate regulatory, educational and public-awareness activities;
2. Invites Member States to undertake, on each AI Day, public dissemination of national or regional developments pertaining to AI governance, including but not limited to:
(a) Compliance with the AI Constitution’s Foundational Principles [2]: Ensuring that all legislative, regulatory, and educational initiatives on AI Day uphold the core tenets of the AI Constitution—namely, the primacy of human rights, the equitable integration of AI into society, and the supremacy of ethical oversight in AI development.
(b) Legislative and regulatory measures aimed at promoting ethical AI usage and addressing potential risks, erga omnes;
(c) Ensuring that all newly enacted or significantly amended AI-related measures, research findings, and workforce-protection strategies are submitted in a timely manner to the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository [9], thereby fostering transparency, enhancing intergovernmental collaboration, and facilitating cross-border dissemination of best practices;
(d) Research and development initiatives fostering equitable and responsible AI innovation, taking into account human-centric design principles, including targeted capacity-building, resource mobilization, and open-access educational programs aimed at bridging the AI divide, particularly in developing regions or marginalized communities [2];
(e) Policies and programs aligned with AI Protocol I (Supranational Protocol on Responsible AI Use and Labor Rights) [9], designed to safeguard labor rights, promote safe working conditions, and manage AI-driven workforce transitions, including (where applicable) retraining and social support measures.
(f) Implementation of data-driven frameworks, such as the AI-Human Collaborative Index [9], that measure productivity, job satisfaction, and innovation rates arising from AI-human collaboration, with a view to informing evidence-based policy and fostering synergies between technology and the workforce.
3. Encourages private sector entities, academic institutions, and civil society organizations, in coordination with government authorities and relevant international bodies, to:
(a) Undertake capacity-building, research, and public-awareness initiatives in accordance with the measures set forth in operative paragraph 2 of this Resolution, thereby reinforcing transparent, equitable, and ethically guided AI governance;
(b) Develop or adapt an AI-Human Collaborative Index [9] to empirically assess AI’s integration into labor markets, focusing on productivity, job satisfaction, and wider socio-economic impacts, and to share such findings via the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository [9];
(c) Organize conferences, exhibitions, and training programs aimed at exchanging best practices and lessons learned, with a view to strengthening the implementation of ethically and human-centrically designed AI innovations as envisaged under the AI Constitution [2].
4. Requests the Secretary-General to:
(a) Facilitate the coordination of annual high-level forums or expert panel discussions on AI policy, regulatory progress, and emerging challenges in line with the observation of AI Day and dedicate a segment to evaluating the contribution of AI Day activities toward the prospective Sustainable Development Goal (SDG #18), ensuring synergy between AI governance and broader sustainable development objectives;
(b) Report periodically to the General Assembly on the implementation of the present resolution and the impact of AI Day activities worldwide, including, where feasible, a comparative analysis of AI-human collaborative metrics or indices, together with recommendations for strengthening multi-stakeholder cooperation consistent with labor-rights safeguards and transitional support for workers, pro bono humani generis, with a view to enhancing responsible AI development and ensuring equitable integration of AI systems across all sectors [9].
(c) Provide neutral, authoritative guidance on cross-border AI governance challenges, dispute resolution, and risk mitigation strategies, conforme à l’esprit of fostering trust, transparency, and accountability in the deployment of AI technologies;
(d) Issue periodic public recommendations – published via the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository – on best practices and emerging trends in AI governance, thereby advancing the universal aspiration of ethical AI innovation [2, 9].
5. Reaffirms that the observance of the AI Day does not create new legal obligations upon Member States per se, yet demands a bona fide commitment from the international community to harness AI for the common good, while upholding human dignity, ethical principles, and the overarching purposes of the United Nations;
6. Calls upon all relevant United Nations bodies, specialized agencies, and regional organizations to mainstream AI Day into their respective work programs, ensuring alignment with existing international standards and frameworks aimed at promoting responsible AI innovation;
7. Invites Member States, specialized agencies, and all other stakeholders to mobilize resources and expertise, including through voluntary contributions, partnerships, or in-kind support, to enhance awareness-building and capacity development activities in observance of AI Day;
8. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its next session an item entitled “AI Day: A Catalyzer for the Creation of a Novel Sustainable Development Goal (SDG #18),” with a view to exploring the feasibility of establishing an eighteenth Sustainable Development Goal, dedicated to harnessing AI for inclusive, equitable, and sustainable development, and thereby enhancing the 2030 Agenda’s impact [4] through the responsible integration of AI technologies.
9. Further decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
Synthesizing aspects of humanity’s academic activity.
During the creation of the aforementioned Resolution, we simultaneously drew attention to the global historical trajectory of scientific works in all fields of research, in particular during previous and current centuries. This approach was undertaken from the standpoint of evaluating content, humanity’s comprehension of the theses and methodologies presented in scientific articles, the language in which these works are written, as well as their outcomes and inventions.
In this regard, it is significant to mention recent research (that strikes a particular chord with our observations) – including an extensive analysis by The Economist of over 300,000 PhD abstracts from 1812 to 2023 – which suggests that academic prose is becoming progressively more complex, verging on what some critics decry as ‘gobbledygook’. In the humanities and social sciences, Flesch reading-ease scores have plummeted dramatiquement, plunging from relatively accessible levels to densities once reserved for highly specialized scientific treatises [10].
Although higher specialization and new technologies can justify precise terminology, the precipitous decline in clarity raises questions about the raison d’être of scholarship if it becomes unintelligible to all but a cloistered coterie of specialists. Thus, mutatis mutandis, a call for lucidity in academic writing remains, to quote The Economist, ‘a breath of fresh air.’
In turn, we have published approximately fifty scientific works in the sphere of AI legislative regulation employing language accessible to broader audiences as well as specialized terminology for advanced scholarly discourse. We have participated in several dozen international scientific-practical conferences and delivered presentations in the UN among global experts in the AI field. And this initiative-based, active, pro bono activity continues.
Securing IP in the Era of Advanced AI.
Active AI development, on the one hand, solves many tasks for humanity, yet on the other hand, raises a number of significant problematic issues. Among other problems, we anticipate an obvious threat of unregulated conditions in the new realities of intellectual property protection. In this connection, it is evident that the current state of scientific research in the sphere of criminal-legal protection and the prevention of criminal and other offenses concerning intellectual property protection requires improvement.
Possible changes will affect the concept and characteristics of intellectual property as an object of criminal-legal protection, as well as the system of criminal and other offenses encroaching upon intellectual property.
In view of AI’s new role in the legislative coordinate system, additional research is needed on preventing criminal and other offenses in the sphere of intellectual property protection, including general-social, especially criminological, and individual means of prevention.
In the future, the range of subjects involved in preventing criminal and other offenses in the sphere of intellectual property protection may also expand. Thus, now more than ever, we need to refine international experience in preventing offenses in the sphere of intellectual property protection and to intensify international cooperation in this domain. We must utilize all existing models of legal protection of intellectual property in the criminal and other legislation of world countries. We must update the organizational and legal foundations of preventing criminal and other offenses in the sphere of intellectual property protection. Therefore, we conclude that the horizon of tasks is far too great for continued inert observation – every responsible and interested party must urgently, actively, cohesively, and purposefully act for the protection of human rights, property rights, and the comprehensive security of humanity.
Summative Reflections on the Research and its Future Pathways.
In light of the foregoing, we respectfully propose that the United Nations consider and adopt the Resolution on AI Day, developed by the Global Scientific Center for Strategic Research on Artificial Intelligence POLLYPRIANY. We strongly believe that this initiative – rooted in ethical oversight, transparent cooperation, and responsible innovation – will serve as a clarion call for the international community to recognize and harness AI’s vast potential pro bono humani generis.
By formally celebrating AI Day, we aspire to ensure that the dignity of humankind, the sanctity of scientific progress, and the secure evolution of AI remain paramount in the legislative and practical frameworks of every Member State.
References:
1) AI Constitution / Polina Prianykova – Kyiv, ‘FrancoPak’, 2024, – 392 pages.
2) Prianykova, P., (2023). FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Series of publications). Online Office: International Human Rights Defender on AI Polina Prianykova.
Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-polina-prianykova
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
3) Prianykova, P., (2024). GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC CENTER FOR STRATEGIC RESEARCH ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POLLYPRIANY AS A PLATFORM FOR OPTIMIZING LOGICAL TRAJECTORIES AND PRESENTING THE RATIONAL CORE OF SCIENTIFIC INITIATIVES. Online Office: International Human Rights Defender on AI Polina Prianykova.
Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/global-ai-center-pollypriany-institutes
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
4) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted on 25 September 2015 by General Assembly resolution 70/1 (A/RES/70/1).
Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/291/89/pdf/n1529189.pdf
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
5) Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Adopted on 10 December 1948 by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III).
Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/nr0/043/88/pdf/nr004388.pdf
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
6) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted on 16 December 1966 by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI).
Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
7) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Adopted on 16 December 1966 by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI).
Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
8) Pact for the Future, Adopted on 22 September 2024 by General Assembly resolution A/RES/79/1.
Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n24/272/22/pdf/n2427222.pdf
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
9) Prianykova, P., & Prianykov, V., (2024, November 12–22). AI PROTOCOL I elaborated in the Spirit of the AI Constitution’s Principles and Provisions (Supranational Protocol on Responsible AI Use and Labor Rights). Officially published in International Scientific and Practical Conferences in Seville, Spain (Table of Contents, №29) and in Rotterdam, Netherlands (Table of Contents, №26). Online Office: International Human Rights Defender on AI Polina Prianykova, Global AI Center POLLYPRIANY.
Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/global-ai-center-pollypriany
(Accessed: January 12, 2025);
10) The Economist. (2024, December 18). Academic writing is getting harder to read – the humanities most of all. In Science & technology section under the headline ‘Hot air’ [Print edition].
(Accessed: January 12, 2025).
Officially Published:
January 14 – 17, 2025, Boston, USA (Table of Contents, №20)
© POLINA PRIANYKOVA. All rights reserved.


