Final installment (Inception in Part I)

 

Article III – AI-Human Collaborative Index

​

1. Establishment and Purpose:

1.1 Creation of the Index: A quantitatively driven AI-Human Collaborative Index shall be established, mandated to measure and evaluate the collaborative dynamics between human labor forces and Artificial Intelligence systems across various sectors. This index shall assess factors including but not limited to productivity, job satisfaction, innovation rates, and economic impacts arising from AI-human collaborations.

1.2 Objective: The primary objective of this index is to provide a robust, empirical basis for evaluating the effectiveness of AI integration in enhancing human work environments and for identifying areas where AI deployment could be optimized to promote human welfare and workplace innovation.

​

2. Data Collection and Methodology:

2.1 Comprehensive Metrics: The index shall employ a range of metrics designed to capture the nuanced impacts of AI on the workforce. These metrics will include qualitative assessments from employee satisfaction surveys, quantitative data from productivity records, and economic analyses conducted by independent experts.

​

2.2 Standardization of Data Collection: Data collection methods shall be standardized to ensure consistency and reliability across different industries and countries. This standardization will facilitate comparative analysis and benchmarking of AI-human interaction effectiveness.

​

3. Implementation and Utilization:

3.1 Implementation Strategy: Each signatory state is required to implement the AI-Human Collaborative Index within their national AI programs. States must collect data annually, following the prescribed methodologies, to maintain up-to-date insights into the state of AI-human collaborations.

​

3.2 Policy Application: The results derived from the index shall be utilized to inform and refine national policies on AI deployment. Insights gained from the index will guide legislative and regulatory adjustments, aiming to enhance AI integration strategies and to mitigate any identified risks or deficiencies.

​

4. Reporting and Review:

4.1 Annual Reporting: Signatory states shall submit annual reports to an appointed International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee, detailing the findings and trends identified through the AI-Human Collaborative Index.

​

4.2 Periodic Review and Updates: The methodologies and metrics of the AI-Human Collaborative Index shall be subject to periodic review by an international panel of AI and labor experts, to ensure they remain relevant and effectively aligned with technological advancements and labor market evolutions.

​

5. Adjustment and Innovation Encouragement:

5.1 Continuous Improvement: Based on annual index results, signatory states shall be encouraged to implement targeted improvements in AI-human collaboration areas identified as underperforming or having significant potential for enhanced synergies.

5.2 Innovation Incentives: States demonstrating exceptional improvements and innovative practices in AI-human collaboration, as measured by the index, shall be eligible for international recognition and support, including grants and access to exclusive international research and development programs.

​

6. Oversight by International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee:

6.1 Administrative Responsibility: The International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee shall oversee the administration of the AI-Human Collaborative Index, ensuring that the collection, analysis, and reporting of data are conducted in accordance with the highest standards of accuracy and ethical considerations.

6.2 Strategic Guidance: The Committee will provide strategic guidance on the utilization of the Index to inform international policies and collaborative efforts aimed at enhancing AI-human integration across various sectors.

6.3 Public Access and Repository Inclusion: The AI-Human Collaborative Index shall be publicly accessible and systematically included in the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository. This inclusion ensures that the data and findings from the index are transparent and readily available to all stakeholders and the public, enhancing global understanding and collaborative potential in AI-human integration practices.

​

Article IV – International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee

​

1. Establishment and Purpose:

1.1 Establishment: The International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Committee’) is hereby established as an independent supervisory body dedicated to overseeing the collaborative efforts in AI development, deployment, and regulation at an international level.

1.2 Purpose: The Committee’s primary purpose is to ensure that AI development and deployment across nations adhere to agreed-upon ethical standards, international human rights norms, and labor regulations, thereby facilitating a coordinated and harmonious approach to global AI challenges.

​

2. Composition and Membership:

2.1 Composition: The Committee shall be composed of representatives from various stakeholder groups, including governmental bodies, academic institutions, the private sector, non-governmental organizations, and civil society, reflecting a broad range of expertise in AI ethics, law, technology, labor rights, and international relations.

2.2 Selection Process: Members shall be appointed based on their expertise, experience, and contribution to the field of AI, with consideration given to achieving geographical and gender diversity to represent global perspectives fairly.

​

3. Roles and Responsibilities:

3.1 Oversight of International Collaboration: The Committee will oversee and facilitate international collaborative projects in AI, ensuring that such projects align with ethical guidelines and international standards.

3.2 Development of Guidelines: The Committee is tasked with developing and updating guidelines for ethical AI collaboration, focusing on transparency, accountability, and the protection of human and labor rights.

3.3 Monitoring and Reporting: It will monitor international AI projects and initiatives, providing regular reports on their compliance with ethical standards and their impact on society and labor markets.

3.4 Management of the AI-Human Collaborative Index:

3.4.1 Index Oversight: The Committee is tasked with the oversight of the AI-Human Collaborative Index, ensuring it effectively measures and evaluates the dynamics between human labor forces and AI systems, facilitating improvements in AI deployments worldwide.

3.4.2 Policy Implementation: Utilize insights from the Index to guide the development of international standards and practices that promote optimal collaboration between humans and AI, enhancing workplace productivity and human welfare globally.

3.5 Management of the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository:

3.5.1 Repository Oversight: The Committee shall oversee the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository, ensuring it serves as a comprehensive resource center for the storage and dissemination of AI-related legislative documents, best practices, and ethical guidelines globally. This responsibility includes supervising the repository’s operations, verifying the accuracy of the contents, and ensuring timely updates and compliance with international data protection regulations.

3.5.2 Standardization and Accessibility: Develop and enforce standards for the submission and formatting of documents to ensure consistency and ease of access. The Committee will facilitate the establishment of protocols that govern how documents are uploaded, stored, and accessed, maintaining high standards for data integrity and security.

3.5.3 Compliance Monitoring: Monitor compliance by member states with the requirement to submit legislative updates to the repository within the stipulated timeframe. This includes implementing mechanisms to track submissions, verify document authenticity, and ensure that all member states adhere to their obligations under the Protocol.

3.5.4 Legal and Ethical Compliance: Ensure that the repository operates in strict compliance with international legal standards and ethical guidelines. This involves regular audits of the repository’s operations, conducted by appointed experts or third-party organizations, to safeguard against any form of data misuse or breach of confidentiality.

3.5.5 Resource Allocation and Management: Manage resources allocated for the maintenance and enhancement of the repository, including technological upgrades and staff training. Ensure that sufficient funding and expertise are available to support the ongoing operational needs of the repository, thereby guaranteeing its effectiveness and reliability.

3.5.6 Public Access and Engagement: Promote the repository as a key public resource for knowledge about AI regulations and practices worldwide. This includes providing open access where appropriate and engaging with academic, legal, and professional communities to encourage the use of the repository as a research and reference tool.

​

4. Authority and Enforcement Powers:

4.1 Regulatory Authority: The Committee will have the authority to recommend changes to international policies and practices concerning AI development and deployment based on its monitoring and evaluations.

4.2 Enforcement Powers: While the Committee will primarily work through consensus and advisory roles, it may also be granted specific enforcement powers to deal with violations of international agreements, such as the imposition of sanctions or the recommendation for suspension of AI projects that violate ethical standards.

​

5. Collaboration and Information Sharing:

5.1 International Collaboration: The Committee will facilitate and encourage collaboration between nations and across sectors to leverage collective knowledge and resources in addressing AI challenges.

5.2 Information Sharing: It will establish a secure platform for sharing information and best practices among international partners, promoting transparency and mutual learning.

​

6. Capacity Building and Education:

6.1 Training Programs: The Committee will organize training programs and workshops for AI practitioners and policymakers on ethical AI development and collaborative practices.

6.2 Public Education Campaigns: It will also initiate public education campaigns to raise awareness about the ethical implications of AI and the importance of international cooperation in managing AI’s societal impacts.

7. Review and Adaptation:

7.1 Periodic Review: The Committee will periodically review its own effectiveness and the relevance of its guidelines and strategies, adapting them as necessary to keep pace with technological advancements and changes in the international landscape.

7.2 Stakeholder Feedback: Regular feedback mechanisms will be established to gather input from diverse stakeholders, ensuring that the Committee’s activities remain aligned with the broader community’s needs and expectations.

​

8. In compliance with the AI Constitution, the supervision of the Committee will be undertaken by the following bodies:

8.1 AI Regulatory Council: As the supreme authority within the AI regulatory system, the AI Regulatory Council is tasked with overseeing the strategic direction and compliance of the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee. This includes approving, amending, or vetoing strategic guidelines and operational directives proposed by the Oversight Committee to ensure alignment with global AI safety and rights standards. 

8.2 AI Synergetic Center: The AI Synergetic Center, acting under the directives of the AI Regulatory Council, shall be responsible for the day-to-day management and implementation of the decisions affecting international AI collaboration. This includes the execution of policies and standards that pertain to cross-border AI operations and collaborations maintained or monitored by the Oversight Committee.

8.3 AI Regulatory Arbitrators: The AI Regulatory Arbitrators will monitor the legal compliance of the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee’s activities. This includes auditing operations, resolving disputes, and ensuring that the Committee’s functions adhere to the ethical and legal standards as prescribed in the AI Constitution and associated Digital Legislation.

8.4 Supervision over AI-Human Collaborative Index Functions:

8.4.1 Supervisory Role of AI Regulatory Council: The AI Regulatory Council, along with the House of Labor, will jointly review and approve the methodologies and findings of the AI-Human Collaborative Index as managed by the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee. This collaborative supervision ensures that the Index’s operations align with international AI governance standards and adequately reflect the labor perspectives crucial for comprehensive AI policy-making. The House of Labor, in its capacity, provides additional oversight focusing on labor-specific impacts and the integration of labor standards within the Index’s framework.

8.4.2 Coordination with AI Synergetic Center: The AI Synergetic Center will coordinate the practical implementation of strategies derived from the AI-Human Collaborative Index, applying these strategies to enhance AI safety protocols and labor practices globally.

8.4.3 Monitoring by AI Regulatory Arbitrators: The AI Regulatory Arbitrators will ensure that the administration of the AI-Human Collaborative Index adheres strictly to the legal and ethical standards set forth in the AI Constitution, addressing any discrepancies or issues of non-compliance.

 

Article V – Global AI Safety and Rights Repository

1. Establishment and Purpose:

1.1 Establishment: The Global AI Safety and Rights Repository is hereby established as an official website to consolidate and disseminate global knowledge and regulatory practices concerning the safe and ethical deployment of Artificial Intelligence. This platform will serve as the primary access point for all repository content.

1.2 Purpose: The repository aims to support international cooperation by providing a comprehensive database of AI safety standards, labor rights protections, ethical guidelines, and regulatory frameworks. This online resource will enhance the ability of member states and organizations to develop and implement effective AI governance and labor practices.

​

2. Content and Scope:

2.1 Content Collection: The repository will gather information including but not limited to:

• International and national AI regulations and laws

• Best practices in AI safety and ethics

• Research papers and articles on AI’s impact on labor and employment

• Case studies of AI integration across various sectors

• Guidelines on the protection of digital personhood and AI-human interaction

2.2 Scope of Access: The repository will be accessible to government bodies, academic institutions, industry stakeholders, and the public, ensuring transparency and widespread dissemination of knowledge.

​

3. Management and Oversight:

3.1 Administrative Responsibility: The management of the repository will be overseen by the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee, which will ensure the accuracy and relevance of the information.

3.2 Updating and Maintenance: The repository’s content will be regularly updated to reflect the latest advancements and insights in AI technology and labor practices. 

​

4. Utilization and Impact:

4.1 Policy Development: Policymakers and regulators can utilize the repository to inform and refine AI governance frameworks, ensuring they are based on the latest and most effective practices.

4.2 Research and Development: Researchers and developers can use the repository to stay informed about safety and ethical standards, helping to guide the development of new AI technologies that are compliant with established norms.

​

5. Funding and Resources:

5.1 Financial Support: The repository’s operations will be funded through contributions from member states, supplemented by grants from international technological and human rights organizations.

5.2 Resource Allocation: Adequate resources, both technological and human, will be allocated to maintain the repository’s infrastructure and to ensure it meets the needs of its global users effectively.

​

6. Review and Adaptation:

6.1 Periodic Review: The effectiveness of the repository will be reviewed biennially by the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee to ensure it continues to meet its objectives and serves the evolving needs of the AI and labor rights community.

6.2 Adaptation of Practices: Based on feedback and technological advancements, the repository will adapt its practices to continue providing valuable and current information to its users.

​

7. Compliance and Accountability:

7.1 Document Submission Requirements: Each member state is required to maintain a dedicated page within the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository for the publication of all newly enacted or significantly amended AI-related legislative documents. These documents must be uploaded to the repository within two days following their official enactment or amendment.

7.2 International Transparency: The obligation to publish legislative changes promptly is designed to ensure that all member states have immediate access to the latest legal standards and requirements, facilitating a uniform understanding and implementation of AI regulations globally.

7.3 Legal Binding and Liability:

7.3.1 Enforcement of Submission Timelines: Failure to comply with the document submission timelines shall be considered a breach of the Protocol, subjecting the defaulting state to potential sanctions or other corrective actions as determined by the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee.

7.3.2 Liability for Misrepresentation: Any misrepresentation, falsification, or omission in the documentation provided to the repository is legally actionable. The individual(s) responsible for such discrepancies will be held liable under international law, facing potential legal penalties including fines, suspension of AI development privileges, or other sanctions as appropriate.

7.3.3 Monitoring and Audits: Regular audits will be conducted by the AI Regulatory Arbitrators to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information posted to the repository. These audits will help prevent malpractice and ensure that all member states adhere to the highest standards of transparency and ethical governance.

7.3.4 Remedial Measures: In cases of non-compliance or misrepresentation, the affected state will be required to take immediate remedial actions to correct the record and prevent future occurrences. The specifics of required actions will be outlined by the International AI Collaboration Oversight Committee.

Article VI – Cross-National AI Labor Council (‘House of Labor’)

1. Purpose and Establishment:

1.1 Recognizing the imperative need for a harmonized approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance as it pertains to labor and employment across national boundaries, the Cross-National AI Labor Council, hereinafter referred to as the ‘House of Labor,’ is hereby constituted under the auspices of the AI Regulatory Council.

1.2 The House of Labor is established as the principal advisory and legislative body tasked with addressing the intersections of AI technology and global labor markets, ensuring that AI deployment enhances rather than undermines human labor across member states.

​

2. Composition and Membership:

2.1 The House of Labor shall consist of representatives from member states, appointed for their expertise in labor law, AI technology, ethics, and international relations.

2.2 Membership shall include government officials, labor union representatives, AI industry experts, and academicians, thereby ensuring a diverse and comprehensive representation of all stakeholders in AI labor issues.

​

3. Roles and Responsibilities:

3.1 Develop and promulgate international labor standards and regulations for AI deployment, focusing on safe, ethical, and beneficial integration of AI into the workforce.

3.2 Assess the impacts of AI on employment, working conditions, and labor rights, and devise strategies to mitigate any adverse effects.

3.3 Facilitate international cooperation and dialogue on AI labor policies, serving as a platform for the exchange of best practices and the harmonization of regulatory approaches across countries.

3.4 Provide advisory support to member states in implementing internationally agreed-upon AI labor standards and adapting national legislation to conform to these standards.

3.5 Documentation and Publication: Documentation of the developments, standards, regulations, and advisory support as described afore shall be systematically uploaded to the Global AI Safety and Rights Repository. This will ensure all member states and relevant stakeholders have access to up-to-date information and can maintain alignment with international labor and AI safety standards.

​

4. Powers:

4.1 Issue binding resolutions to member states regarding AI and labor, contingent upon ratification by the AI Regulatory Council.

4.2 Impose sanctions or recommend corrective actions against member states that fail to comply with international AI labor standards.

4.3 Undertake investigations and conduct audits on AI labor practices across member states to ensure adherence to international agreements and standards.

​

5. Operational Framework:

5.1 The House of Labor shall convene biannually, or as necessitated by emerging issues, to review AI labor policies, discuss new challenges, and revise its directives accordingly.

5.2 Establish specialized committees to address distinct aspects of AI and labor, including ethical AI deployment, workforce retraining programs, and enforcement of cross-border labor rights.

​

6. Reporting and Accountability:

6.1 Annually, the House of Labor must submit comprehensive reports to the AI Regulatory Council detailing its operations, findings, and the status of AI labor standard implementations globally.

6.2 Independent audits of the House of Labor shall be performed periodically by the AI Regulatory Arbitrators to evaluate the operational transparency and effectiveness of its activities. These audits are intended to ensure that the House of Labor adheres strictly to the legal and ethical standards prescribed in the AI Constitution and Digital Legislation. The results of these audits will help in identifying areas of improvement, ensuring that the House of Labor effectively fulfills its mandate and maintains the highest standards of accountability and efficiency in its operations.

​

7. Resource Allocation and Funding:

7.1 Adequate financial and human resources shall be allocated to the House of Labor to effectively fulfill its mandates. It is fully prohibited for funding to be sourced from contributions that could potentially influence the independence and unbiased decision-making of the House of Labor. This includes barring any financial contributions from private enterprises or international bodies that could exert undue influence. Funding shall solely consist of allocations from member states, managed under stringent guidelines to safeguard the impartiality and integrity of the House of Labor.

7.2 Financial operations of the House of Labor shall adhere to strict standards of transparency and accountability, with detailed budgets and financial reports required as part of the annual reporting process.

​

8. Amendment and Revision:

8.1 The legislative framework and operational structure of the House of Labor shall be subject to review and potential amendment every five years, or sooner if necessitated by significant changes in the AI and labor markets. Any proposed amendments must receive a two-thirds majority approval from the AI Regulatory Council to be enacted.

 

Concluding Remarks. This scholarly paper represents the research initiated and personally conducted by POLINA PRIANYKOVA, President of the Global AI Center POLLYPRIANY and supported by the AI Institute on Advanced Intellectual Property Law and Ethical Governance within the Center.

​

The analysis proffered herein has systematically dissected prevailing gaps in the AI regulatory frameworks, addressing these with robust legal formulations in the form of the Supranational Protocol on Responsible AI Use and Labor Rights aimed at fortifying the interstice between AI deployment and labor rights — a sine qua non in this era of exponential technological advancement.

​

It is also salient to mention the inherent capacity of the Supranational Protocol on Responsible AI Use and Labor Rights to act as a catalyst for extensive legal scholarship and legislative development, particularly in the realm of intellectual property rights. As AI systems increasingly become co-creators of potentially copyrightable and patentable outputs alongside human intellects, defining ownership and liability in intellectual property generated by AI or in collaboration with humans is becoming crucial. The Protocol, in its current form, robustly addresses multifarious dimensions and is poised to evolve further in the aforementioned direction in particular. It is envisioned to stimulate a broader impact on global intellectual property laws, serving as a foundational framework that supports and enhances legislative adaptations to technological innovations. Thus, the Protocol not only safeguards labor rights but also has a potential to extend its protective reach to the creative outputs of both AI and human collaborations, ensuring a balanced and forward-looking legal approach, which comprises both preventative strategies and remedial solutions, in the rapidly evolving technological landscape.

​

Thus, developed through comprehensive academic research and practical insights, this Protocol serves as both a scholarly contribution and a practical guide for policymakers and stakeholders.

​

This academic paper does not merely propose changes; it advocates for a renaissance in the legal treatment of AI, calling for laws that are as adaptive and dynamic as the technologies they seek to govern.

References:

​​

1) United Nations’ Multi-Stakeholder Hearing ‘Financing for Sustainable Development: Enhancing Indigenous Peoples’ Traditional Governance System for Accessing Opportunities of Financing’, October 29, 2024. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/global-ai-center-indigenous-peoples-and-ai (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

2) UNESCO Women4Ethical AI initiative & AI CONSTITUTION by POLINA PRIANYKOVA © 2023, October 30, 2024. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/unesco-oct-30-2024-women4ethicalai (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

3) African Union’s Validation Workshop of the Implementation Plan AU Continental Strategy on Artificial Intelligence, November 06-08, 2024. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/au-november-07-2024-validation-workshop (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

4) Prianykova, P. 2022. ‘Voluntary global acceptance of fundamental Human Rights’ limitations in the age of AI automation and deployment of trailblazing technologies.’ December 13-16, Boston, USA. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/labour-law-world-economy-ai (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

5) Prianykova, P. 2023. ‘Prognostication of Future Professions as a Guarantee of Human Rights Protection in the era of Artificial Intelligence.’ February 21-24, Stockholm, Sweden. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/prognostication-of-future-professions-ai (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

6) Prianykova, P. 2023. ‘AI as a watershed moment for artistic spheres: Ethical & Legal quandaries that may be addressed by the Enactment of Polina Prianykova’s Scientific & Academic Doctrines on AI: Adoption of AI Constitution, Implementation of AI into the Worldwide Legislation and Establishment of State Monopoly on AI.’ May 09-12, Bilbao, Spain. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/artistic-vocations-and-ai (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

7) Prianykova, P. 2023. ‘AI Constitution – Theses, Principles, and Provisions of the Fundamental Law on Artificial Intelligence.’ October 31 - November 03, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-theses-principles-provisions (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

 

8) Prianykova, P. 2024. ‘AI Constitution, AI and New Job Horizons: Shaping Strategic International Workforce Policies for Human and Robotic Integration, inter alia into the Realm of Cybersecurity, in Times of Crisis and Change.’ April 23 - 26, 2024, Zagreb, Croatia. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-cybersecurity-jobs (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

9) Prianykova, P. 2024. ‘Debut of the Global Ai Center POLLYPRIANY at the Africa-Japan Youth Drive-2024: Participation, Analysis and Research of Strategies, Prospects, and Innovations, inter alia 統合イノベーション戦略.’ August 27 – 30, 2024, Bergen, Norway. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/debut-of-the-global-ai-center-pollypriany-africa-japan-youth-drive-2024 (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

10) Prianykova, P. 2024, AI Constitution, FrancoPak, Kyiv, 392 pp. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-full-version-polina-prianykova (Accessed: November 10, 2024).

​

Officially Published: November 19 – 22, 2024, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Table of Contents, №26)

https://isg-konf.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/PROSPECTIVE-DIRECTIONS-OF-MODERN-SCIENCE-AND-EDUCATION-IN-THE-WORLD.pdf

​​​

© POLINA PRIANYKOVA. All rights reserved.