It is genuinely encouraging to see these UN80 briefings continue — and, importantly, to see 

civil society voices being raised and meaningfully amplified within the reform conversation.

 

From the perspective of the Global AI Center POLLYPRIANY, we would also welcome an explicit implementation layer on Artificial Intelligence as an institutional capability — not as a label, but as a governed function. In practical terms, this means consistency across pillars: clear legal bases, effective human oversight, auditability, accessibility-by-design, and measurable impact review.

 

It is worth noting that much of the normative thinking on AI regulation

should have matured by 2025 

— a point I have reiterated for years. We are now entering a phase in which regulatory choices, as well as institutional inertia, will generate consequences that become increasingly difficult to unwind. Yet this is precisely why dialogue still matters: policy can still be refined, safeguards can still be strengthened, and implementation can still be steered toward legitimacy.

 

We continue to advance these ideas through our research and formal policy documents, published on the Global AI Center’s official website, and we remain fully open to constructive dialogue and ready to contribute implementation-oriented legal guidance.

 

My sincere thanks to Mr. Guy Ryder, Under-Secretary-General for Policy, and the UN team for the excellent moderation and for sustaining an open, professional space for substantive engagement.