13 May 2026,
the Global AI Center POLLYPRIANY participated in the UNODC Constructive Dialogue on Firearms under the UNTOC Review Mechanism, convened following the 13th meeting of the Working Group on Firearms.
This year’s substantive focus centred on the implementation of:
💠 Article 6 — Confiscation, seizure and disposal of firearms
💠 Article 9 — Deactivation of firearms
At the Dialogue, we placed particular emphasis on one urgent legal premise:



Firearms control is no longer only a matter of physical custody.
It is also a matter of digital integrity, evidence authenticity, traceability and non-diversion.
Where records are incomplete, certificates are forged, storage systems are weak, disposal is unverifiable, or deactivation standards diverge across jurisdictions, illicit firearms may return to circulation through administrative silence, technical loopholes or digital manipulation.
In our contribution, we advanced a law-first, human-rights-compliant framework for integrating AI into firearms control — not as an autonomous enforcement authority, but as a legally controlled integrity layer.
Our proposed architecture focuses on:
💠 Life-cycle traceability of seized and confiscated firearms
💠 Chain-of-custody reliability
💠 AI Storage Vulnerability Index
💠 Disposal verification
💠 Evidence authenticity
💠 Deactivation verification
💠 Reactivation-risk prevention
💠 AI misuse risk mapping
The central idea is far-reaching:
AI should not create automated suspicion, automated guilt or unchecked surveillance.
It should help competent authorities identify vulnerable records, vulnerable procedures and vulnerable control points before they become pathways to diversion, re-diversion or illicit reactivation.
In the context of
the Firearms Protocol,
responsible AI must therefore be measured not by technological sophistication alone, but by whether it strengthens the rule of law.
AI is legitimate in firearms control only where
it narrows the space for manipulation, strengthens the reliability of public records, and leaves final authority where it belongs — with law, competent institutions and accountable human judgement.
We are grateful to the UNODC Civil Society Unit, the wider UNODC teams involved in the UNTOC Review Mechanism, and to H.E. José Antonio Zabalgoitia, Chair of the Constructive Dialogue on Firearms and the 13th meeting of the Working Group on Firearms, for facilitating this timely and substantive exchange among States, civil society and relevant stakeholders.


© POLINA PRIANYKOVA.
OLHA PRIANYKOVA.
VALENTYN PRIANYKOV.
All rights reserved.


